He [Henry Maxwell] had planned
when he came to the city to return to Raymond and be in his own pulpit
on Sunday. But Friday morning he had received at the Settlement a call
from the pastor of one of the largest churches in Chicago, and had been
invited to fill the pulpit for both morning and evening service.
At first he hesitated, but finally accepted, seeing
in it the hand of the Spirit's guiding power. He would test his own
question. He would prove the truth or falsity of the charge made against
the church at the Settlement meeting. How far would it go in its self-denial
for Jesus' sake? How closely would it walk in His steps? Was the church
willing to suffer for its Master?
Saturday night he spent in prayer, nearly the whole
night. There had never been so great a wrestling in his soul, not even
during his strongest experiences in Raymond. He had in fact entered
upon another new experience. The definition of his own discipleship
was receiving an added test at this time, and he was being led into
a larger truth of the Lord.
Sunday morning the great church was filled to its
utmost. Henry Maxwell, coming into the pulpit from that all-night vigil,
felt the pressure of a great curiosity on the part of the people. They
had heard of the Raymond movement, as all the churches had, and the
recent action of Dr. Bruce had added to the general interest in the
pledge. With this curiosity was something deeper, more serious. Mr.
Maxwell felt that also. And in the knowledge that the Spirit's presence
was his living strength, he brought his message and gave it to that
church that day.
He had never been what would be called a great preacher.
He had not the force nor the quality that makes remarkable preachers.
But ever since he had promised to do as Jesus would do, he had grown
in a certain quality of persuasiveness that had all the essentials of
true eloquence. This morning the people felt the complete sincerity
and humility of a man who had gone deep into the heart of a great truth.
After telling briefly of some results in his own
church in Raymond since the pledge was taken, he went on to ask the
question he had been asking since the Settlement meeting. He had taken
for his theme the story of the young man who came to Jesus asking what
he must do to obtain eternal life. Jesus had tested him. “Sell all that
thou hast and give to the poor, and thou shalt have treasure in heaven;
and come follow me.” But the young man was not willing to suffer to
that extent. If following Jesus meant suffering in that way, he was
not willing. He would like to follow Jesus, but not if he had to give
“Is it true,” continued Henry Maxwell, and his fine, thoughtful face
glowed with a passion of appeal that stirred the people as they had
seldom been stirred, “is it true that the church of today, the church
that is called after Christ's own name, would refuse to follow Him at
the expense of suffering, of physical loss, of temporary gain?
The statement was made at a large gathering in the Settlement last week
by a leader of workingmen that it was hopeless to look to the church
for any reform or redemption of society. On what was that statement
based? Plainly on the assumption that the church contains for
the most part men and women who think more ‘of their own ease and luxury’
than of the sufferings and needs and sins of humanity. How far
is that true? Are the Christians of America ready to have their
discipleship tested? How about the men who possess large wealth?
Are they ready to take that wealth and use it as Jesus would?
How about the men and women of great talent? Are they ready to
consecrate that talent to humanity as Jesus undoubtedly would do?
“Is it not true that the call has come in this age for a new exhibition
of Christian discipleship? You who live in this great sinful city
must know that better than I do. Is it possible you can go your
ways careless or thoughtless of the awful condition of men and women
and children who are dying, body and soul, for need of Christian help?
Is it not a matter of concern to you personally that the saloon kills
its thousands more surely than war? Is it not a matter of personal
suffering in some form for you that thousands of able-bodied, willing
men tramp the streets of this city and all cities, crying for work and
drifting into crime and suicide because they cannot find it? Can
you say that this is none of your business? Let each man look
after himself? Would it not be true, think you, that if every
Christian in America did as Jesus would do, society itself, the business
world, yes, the very political system under which our commercial and
governmental activity is carried on, would be so changed that human
suffering would be reduced to a minimum?
“What would be the result if all the church members of this city
tried to do as Jesus would do? It is not possible to say in detail
what the effect would be. But it is easy to say, and it is true,
that instantly the human problem would begin to find an adequate answer.
“What is the test of Christian discipleship? Is it not the
same as in Christ's own time? Have our surroundings modified or
changed the test? If Jesus were here today would He not call some
of the members of this very church to do just what He commanded the
young man, and ask them to give up their wealth and literally follow
Him? I believe He would do that if He felt certain that any church
member thought more of his possessions than of the Savior. The test
would be the same today as then. I believe Jesus would demand — He does
demand now — as close a following, as much suffering, as great self-denial
as when He lived in person on the earth and said, ‘Except a man renounce
all that he hath he cannot be my disciple.’ That is, unless he
is willing to do it for my sake, he cannot be my disciple.
“What would be the result if in this city every church member should
begin to do as Jesus would do? It is not easy to go into details
of the result. But we all know that certain things would be impossible
that are now practiced by church members. What would Jesus do in the
matter of wealth? How would He spend it? What principle
would regulate His use of money? Would He be likely to live in
great luxury and spend ten times as much on personal adornment and entertainment
as He spent to relieve the needs of suffering humanity? How would
Jesus be governed in the making of money? Would He take rentals
from saloons and other disreputable property, or even from tenement
property that was so constructed that the inmates had no such things
as a home and no such possibility as privacy or cleanliness?
“What would Jesus do about the great army of unemployed and desperate
who tramp the streets and curse the church, or are indifferent to it,
lost in the bitter struggle for the bread that tastes bitter when it
is earned on account of the desperate conflict to get it? Would
Jesus care nothing for them? Would He go His way in comparative
ease and comfort? Would He say that it was none of His business?
Would He excuse Himself from all responsibility to remove the causes
of such a condition?
“What would Jesus do in the center of a civilization that hurries
so fast after money that the very girls employed in great business houses
are not paid enough to keep soul and body together without fearful temptations
so great that scores of them fall and are swept over the great boiling
abyss; where the demands of trade sacrifice hundreds of lads in a business
that ignores all Christian duties toward them in the way of education
and moral training and personal affection? Would Jesus, if He
were here today as a part of our age and commercial industry, feel nothing,
do nothing, say nothing, in the face of these facts which every business
“What would Jesus do? Is not that what the disciple ought to
do? Is he not commanded to follow in His steps? How much is the Christianity
of the age suffering for Him? Is it denying itself at the cost of ease,
comfort, luxury, elegance of living? What does the age need more than
personal sacrifice? Does the church do its duty in following Jesus
when it gives a little money to establish missions or relieve extreme
cases of want? Is it any sacrifice for a man who is worth ten million
dollars simply to give ten thousand dollars for some benevolent work?
Is he not giving something that cost him practically nothing so far
as any personal suffering goes? Is it true that the Christian
disciples today in most of our churches are living soft, easy, selfish
lives, very far from any sacrifice that can be called sacrifice?
What would Jesus do?
“It is the personal element that Christian discipleship needs to
emphasize. ‘The gift without the giver is bare.’ The Christianity
that attempts to suffer by proxy is not the Christianity of Christ.
Each individual Christian business man, citizen, needs to follow in
His steps along the path of personal sacrifice to Him. There is not
a different path today from that of Jesus' own times. It is the same
path. The call of this dying century and of the new one soon to be,
is a call for a new discipleship, a new following of Jesus, more like
the early, simple, apostolic Christianity, when the disciples left all
and literally followed the Master. Nothing but a discipleship of this
kind can face the destructive selfishness of the age with any hope of
overcoming it. There is a great quantity of nominal Christianity today.
There is need of more of the real kind. We need revival of the
Christianity of Christ. We have, unconsciously, lazily, selfishly, formally
grown into a discipleship that Jesus himself would not acknowledge.
He would say to many of us when we cry, ‘Lord, Lord,’ ‘I never knew
you!’ Are we ready to take up the cross? Is it possible for this church
to sing with exact truth,
Jesus, I my cross have taken,
All to leave and follow Thee?
If we can sing that truly, then we may claim discipleship. But if
our definition of being a Christian is simply to enjoy the privileges
of worship, be generous at no expense to ourselves, have a good, easy
time surrounded by pleasant friends and by comfortable things, live
respectably and at the same time avoid the world's great stress of sin
and trouble because it is too much pain to bear it — if this is our
definition of Christianity, surely we are a long way from following
the steps of Him who trod the way with groans and tears and sobs of
anguish for a lost humanity; who sweat, as it were, great drops of blood,
who cried out on the upreared cross, ‘My God, my God, why hast thou
“Are we ready to make and live a new discipleship? Are we ready to
reconsider our definition of a Christian? What is it to be a Christian?
It is to imitate Jesus. It is to do as He would do. It is
to walk in His steps.”
When Henry Maxwell finished his sermon, he paused
and looked at the people with a look they never forgot and, at the moment,
did not understand. Crowded into that fashionable church that
day were hundreds of men and women who had for years lived the easy,
satisfied life of a nominal Christianity. A great silence fell
over the congregation. Through the silence there came to the consciousness
of all the souls there present a knowledge, stranger to them now for
years, of a Divine Power. Every one expected the preacher to call
for volunteers who would do as Jesus would do. But Maxwell had been
led by the Spirit to deliver his message this time and wait for results
He closed the service with a tender prayer that kept the Divine Presence
lingering very near every hearer, and the people slowly rose to go out.
Then followed a scene that would have been impossible if any mere man
had been alone in his striving for results.
Men and women in great numbers crowded around the platform to see
Mr. Maxwell and to bring him the promise of their consecration to the
pledge to do as Jesus would do. It was a voluntary, spontaneous movement
that broke upon his soul with a result he could not measure. But had
he not been praying for this very thing? It was an answer that more
than met his desires.
There followed this movement a prayer service that in its impressions
repeated the Raymond experience. In the evening, to Mr. Maxwell's joy,
the Endeavor Society almost to a member came forward, as so many of
the church members had done in the morning, and seriously, solemnly,
tenderly, took the pledge to do as Jesus would do. A deep wave of spiritual
baptism broke over the meeting near its close that was indescribable
in its tender, joyful, sympathetic results. That was a remarkable day
in the history of that church, but even more so in the history of Henry
Maxwell. He left the meeting very late. He went to his room at the Settlement
where he was still stopping, and after an hour with the Bishop and Dr.
Bruce, spent in a joyful rehearsal of the wonderful events of the day,
he sat down to think over again by himself all the experience he was
having as a Christian disciple.
[From this point on, to understand who these
people are, and what he is talking about, you will need to read, or
have read, the In His Steps book by Charles M. Sheldon. The book is
easy to find online. If you live in the vicinity of the
Teaching & Sharing Center of Grand Ledge, we usually have
copies to give away free, or it can also be borrowed
from our lending library.]
He had kneeled to pray, as he always did before going to sleep, and
it was while he was on his knees that he had a waking vision of what
might be in the world when once the new discipleship had made its way
into the conscience and conscientiousness of Christendom. He was fully
conscious of being awake, but no less certainly did it seem to him that
he saw certain results with great distinctiveness, partly as realities
of the future, partly great longings that they might be realities. And
this is what Henry Maxwell saw in this waking vision:
He saw himself, first, going back to the First Church in Raymond,
living there in a simpler, more self-denying fashion than he had yet
been willing to live, because he saw ways in which he could help others
who were really dependent on him for help. He also saw, more dimly,
that the time would come when his position as pastor of the church would
cause him to suffer more on account of growing opposition to his interpretation
of Jesus and His conduct. But this was vaguely outlined. Through it
all he heard the words “My grace is sufficient for thee.”
He saw Rachel Winslow and Virginia Page going on with their work
of service at the Rectangle, and reaching out loving hands of helpfulness
far beyond the limits of Raymond. Rachel he saw married to Rollin Page,
both fully consecrated to the Master's use, both following His steps
with an eagerness intensified and purified by their love for each other.
And Rachel's voice sang on, in slums and dark places of despair and
sin, and drew lost souls back to God and heaven once more.
He saw President Marsh of the college using his great learning and
his great influence to purify the city, to ennoble its patriotism, to
inspire the young men and women who loved as well as admired him to
lives of Christian service, always teaching them that education means
great responsibility for the weak and the ignorant.
He saw Alexander Powers meeting with sore trials in his family life,
with a constant sorrow in the estrangement of wife and friends, but
still going his way in all honor, serving in all his strength the Master
whom he had obeyed, even unto the loss of social distinction and wealth.
He saw Milton Wright, the merchant, meeting with great reverses.
Thrown upon the future by a combination of circumstances, with vast
business interests involved in ruin through no fault of his own, but
coming out of his reverses with clean Christian honor, to begin again
and work up to a position where he could again be to hundreds of young
men an example of what Jesus would do in business.
He saw Edward Norman, editor of the News, by means of the money given
by Virginia, creating a force in journalism that in time came to be
recognized as one of the real factors of the nation to mold its principles
and actually shape its policy, a daily illustration of the might of
a Christian press, and the first of a series of such papers begun and
carried on by other disciples who had also taken the pledge.
He saw Jasper Chase, who had denied his Master, growing into a cold,
cynical, formal life, writing novels that were social successes, but
each one with a sting in it, the reminder of his denial, the bitter
remorse that, do what he would, no social success could remove.
He saw Rose Sterling, dependent for some years upon her aunt and
Felicia, finally married to a man far older than herself, accepting
the burden of a relation that had no love in it on her part, because
of her desire to be the wife of a rich man and enjoy the physical luxuries
that were all of life to her. Over this life also the vision cast certain
dark and awful shadows but they were not shown in detail.
He saw Felicia and Stephen Clyde happily married, living a beautiful
life together, enthusiastic, joyful in suffering, pouring out their
great, strong, fragrant service into the dull, dark, terrible places
of the great city, and redeeming souls through the personal touch of
their home, dedicated to the Human Homesickness all about them.
He saw Dr. Bruce and the Bishop going on with the Settlement work.
He seemed to see the great blazing motto over the door enlarged, “What
would Jesus do?” and by this motto everyone who entered the Settlement
walked in the steps of the Master. He saw Burns and his companion and
a great company of men like them, redeemed and giving in turn to others,
conquering their passions by the divine grace, and proving by their
daily lives the reality of the new birth even in the lowest and most
And now the vision was troubled. It seemed to him that as he kneeled
he began to pray, and the vision was more of a longing for a future
than a reality in the future. The church of Jesus in the city and throughout
the country! Would it follow Jesus? Was the movement begun in Raymond
to spend itself in a few churches like Nazareth Avenue and the one where
he had preached today, and then die away as a local movement, a stirring
on the surface but not to extend deep and far? He felt with agony after
the vision again. He thought he saw the church of Jesus in America open
its heart to the moving of the Spirit and rise to the sacrifice of its
ease and self-satisfaction in the name of Jesus. He thought he saw the
motto, “What would Jesus do?” inscribed over every church door, and
written on every church member's heart.
The vision vanished. It came back clearer than before, and he saw
the Endeavor Societies all over the world carrying in their great processions
at some mighty convention a banner on which was written, “What would
Jesus do?” And he thought in the faces of the young men and women he
saw future joy of suffering, loss, self-denial, martyrdom. And when
this part of the vision slowly faded, he saw the figure of the Son of
God beckoning to him and to all the other actors in his life history.
An Angel Choir somewhere was singing. There was a sound as of many voices
and a shout as of a great victory. And the figure of Jesus grew more
and more splendid. He stood at the end of a long flight of steps. “Yes!
Yes! O my Master, has not the time come for this dawn of the millennium
of Christian history? Oh, break upon the Christendom of this age with
the light and the truth! Help us to follow Thee all the way!”
He rose at last with the awe of one who has looked at heavenly things.
He felt the human forces and the human sins of the world as never before.
And with a hope that walks hand in hand with faith and love Henry Maxwell,
disciple of Jesus, laid him down to sleep and dreamed of the regeneration
of Christendom, and saw in his dream a church of Jesus without spot
or wrinkle or any such thing, following him all the way, walking obediently
in His steps.